...

The “cargo cults” of legal marketing regulation

by Fadi Agour | Nov 10, 2015

Following World War II, “cargo cults” emerged in the Pacific with the goal of summoning the same material abundance they had experienced during the war. Unaware of the modern world, the islanders that formed these cargo cults believed that by replicating the circumstances associated with the war, they would illicit the same wealth.

Attorney regulators and bar members today often enforce legal marketing regulations in a similar fashion – disconnected from the absence of the harm such regulations were originally designed to prevent.

Josh King, Avvo General Counsel and VP of Business Development, has identified a number of legal marketing “cargo cults” that persist today despite a rapidly changing legal landscape.

Legal marketing Cargo Cult #1: Over-regulation of advertising

State regulators continue to regulate attorney speech at their discretion despite the Supreme Court’s “commercial speech” doctrine which states that such regulations must meet a certain level of scrutiny to be in compliance with the first amendment. State bars also continue to issue ethics opinions that overlook the precedence of the first amendment in interpretation of state advertising rules. Should your marketing efforts ever be challenged by such outdated restrictions, it’s important to understand that attorneys have a first amendment right to advertise (see Bates v. State Bar of Arizona).

Legal marketing Cargo Cult #2: Performance-based advertising

Most state rules of professional conduct and the ABA Model Rules continue to state that attorneys cannot pay another person to recommend their services, despite the Bates v. State Bar of Arizona ruling that attorneys have a first amendment right to advertise. Rather than creating new, post-Bates rules, they’ve simply made exceptions to the outdated, pre-Bates rules. The result has been a framework ill-equipped to regulate the current state of advertising today. The reality is that performance-based advertising, such as pay per-click or per-lead, is simply a more efficient form of advertising. Restricting this or any other type of legal advertising must be justified by the state, and in order to be constitutional it must pass the Central Hudson test.

To learn about more “cargo cults” of legal marketing register for our upcoming free CLE webinar, “The Cargo Cult of Legal Marketing Regulations,” on November 12th, 2015 at 10am PT/1pm ET.

Explore More Articles

Why Law Firms Lose the Cases They Already Paid For: 6 Foundation Gaps We See From the Other Side

Marketing agencies write about law firm growth from the outside looking in. We have a different vantage point. Best Case Leads delivers exclusive personal injury leads to law firms across the country, which means we watch the same product, a real injured claimant...

Bicycle Crash Claims: What Personal Injury Firms Need to Know About Liability, Evidence, and Intake

In 2024, 1,103 cyclists were killed and an estimated 52,887 were injured in U.S. traffic crashes, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. For plaintiff firms, those crashes produce some of the most serious injuries in the motor vehicle docket...

The Jealous Mistress Was Always a Bad Business Model: A Growth Framework for Solo and Small Personal Injury Firms

The Jealous Mistress Was Always a Bad Business Model: A Growth Framework for Solo and Small Personal Injury Firms Justice Story's line about the law demanding "lavish homage" has been quoted to every law student for two centuries. It produced a profession with...

Nearly Half of Law Firms Cannot Be Reached by Phone. The Problem Is Not Marketing. It Is the Empty Chair Next to the Owner.

In 2024, Clio commissioned a secret-shopper study of American law firms. Researchers posed as prospective clients and contacted 500 firms by phone and email. The results, published in the 2024 Legal Trends Report, were unambiguous. Only 40 percent of firms answered...

The Trial Lawyer Who Never Tries a Case: How to Grow a Personal Injury Firm Without Losing the Only Leverage That Matters

In 1990, federal district courts completed 4,765 civil jury trials. In 2025, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, they completed 1,048, a decline of 10 percent in a single year and roughly 78 percent over the generation. The state courts, where...

Best Case Leads Celebrates Sixth Consecutive Year on Inc. 5000 List of Fastest-Growing Private Companies in America

Aug 19, 2025 | Press Releases Houston, TX, August 18, 2025 — Best Case Leads, a pioneering leader in legal lead generation, proudly announces its sixth consecutive recognition on the prestigious Inc. 5000 fastest-growing private companies in America, securing...

Baby Formula Litigation, NEC Claims, and the Evolving Landscape of Mass Torts

By Fadi Agour, J.D. Families of premature infants who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed cow–milk–based formula products like Similac and Enfamil continue to pursue justice in both state and federal courts. Recent...

Mass Tort Landscape 2025: Key Cases, Trends & Strategic Opportunities

The mass tort landscape is evolving rapidly, with new cases gaining momentum and established litigations reaching critical phases. For law firms and legal marketers, timing is everything—success hinges on anticipating trends, securing high-value claimants early, and...

Zyprexa & Risperdal 2: The Breast Cancer Link That Could Ignite the Next Mass Tort

The pharmaceutical litigation landscape has seen its share of blockbuster cases—from opioid multidistrict litigations to the ongoing Paraquat Parkinson’s claims. But a new California lawsuit (Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al.) could revive two legacy antipsychotics...

Mass Torts in 2025: A Legal Landscape in Flux

As 2025 unfolds, the world of mass tort litigation shows no signs of slowing down. From pharmaceutical giants to tech behemoths, corporations across industries are facing an unprecedented wave of lawsuits that could reshape their futures. With judges issuing critical...