PageRank is dead: Understanding Domain Authority and Domain Rating for lawyers

Mar 2, 2016

Lawyers must be able to track their progress with SEO. Otherwise, investing in digital platforms can start to feel like throwing money into the black hole of the Internet with little to show for it. Google uses over 200 factors to rank attorney websites stored in its index, and 2 leading metrics that neatly combine those factors into an easily digestible score are known as Domain Authority and Domain Rank. Regardless of browser, search term, searcher, location, or device, these metrics give lawyers the at-a-glance information they need to understand how their SEO efforts are paying off.

Before we get into how these metrics work, let’s take a look at the standard they replaced: PageRank. A formula that had its name coined in Google’s infancy, PageRank still plays a foundational role in the way websites are ranked.

A brief history of PageRank

Before companies like Moz, SEMrush, and Ahrefs popped up, PageRank was one of the few reliable ways to measure the authority of a page or of an entire website. It was, and still is, largely dependent upon inbound links. PageRank is a mathematical algorithm for determining the importance of a web page on a scale of 0 to 10. It relies on the theory that pages linking to a page on the web are indicative of that page’s importance. This method for ranking web pages was developed by Google’s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and it continues to influence the way Google ranks web pages.

Theoretically (and at its simplest level), the more links pointing to a page, the more important that page is.

In the early days of Google, it was easy to “game” the system by building pretty much any kind of link you wanted to. It was difficult to tell which links came from reputable and authoritative sites and which did not.

In response to poor user experience, Google continually refined its algorithm (with updates code named after animals or employees) until it was able to deliver more reliable results. The PageRank metric has remained a KPI for inbound linking, but in recent years it has become a less practical method for measuring a website’s power.

The major drawback to PageRank is that it is not updated on a regular basis by Google, let alone in real time. For lawyers trying to improve their site’s performance in search using link-building campaigns, it used to take months before they would see the increase in PageRank. Google used to update PageRank a couple of times a year. Toolbar PageRank—the PageRank that can be seen in most browser add-ons— has not been updated in a few years, and Google reports that it may not be updated ever again.

Measuring search dominance: Domain Authority and Domain Rating

Some major players in SEO analytics have emerged to help website owners track virtually every aspect of their site’s performance in search. Two of the most reliable are Domain Authority, developed by Moz, and Domain Rating, developed by Ahrefs.

Domain Authority

With tools like Open Site Explorer and Moz Local for citations, Moz is a leader in the SEO software space. Domain Authority, a metric developed by the Seattle-based company to measure the importance of a given domain, can be used to compare the ranking strength of one domain to another in search over time.

Domain Authority is a value from 0-100, and the greater your website’s Domain Authority, the more likely you are to enjoy high rankings in search. Domain Authority is computed by combining other metrics gathered by Moz on a domain—such as the number of linking root domains, the number of total links, Moz TrustMoz Rank, etc.—into a single score.

One of the greatest things about Domain Authority is that it is updated on a regular basis (monthly along with Moz’s API) so it can measure SEO campaigns with relative effectiveness and speed. It can take months to see any kind of change in rankings on search engine results pages. By contrast, PageRank may be updated a couple times per year, so you never really know if you’re making progress or not.

Domain Rating

Domain Rating is a metric developed by Ahrefs. Like Domain Authority, Domain Rating is an assessment of the links between domains. Unlike Domain Authority however, Domain Rating does not use the same proprietary metrics used by Moz. There is not a lot of information on the web about exactly how Ahrefs calculates this metric, but the basic underlying theory is that Domain Rating is higher when a large number of high-quality root domains point to a website. Also like Domain Authority, Domain Rating is updated frequently, allowing lawyers to track the progress of their link-building activities much better than when using Google’s PageRank metric.

Search is an incredibly important part of marketing a law firm these days. Consumers are using the Internet to research and find local legal services more than ever before, and large numbers of them leverage search engines to do so. Modern metrics like Domain Authority and Domain Rating can help attorneys measure all the SEO effort they put into their websites and serve as mile markers on the road to search marketing dominance.

To learn more about how to leverage these modern metrics in your practice, stay tuned for our post next week, “SEO for lawyers: How to use domain authority and domain rating.”

Best Case Leads Celebrates Sixth Consecutive Year on Inc. 5000 List of Fastest-Growing Private Companies in America

Aug 19, 2025 | Press Releases Houston, TX, August 18, 2025 — Best Case Leads, a pioneering leader in legal lead generation, proudly announces its sixth consecutive recognition on the prestigious Inc. 5000 fastest-growing private companies in...

Baby Formula Litigation, NEC Claims, and the Evolving Landscape of Mass Torts

By Fadi Agour, J.D. Families of premature infants who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed cow–milk–based formula products like Similac and Enfamil continue to pursue justice in both state and federal courts. Recent...

Mass Tort Landscape 2025: Key Cases, Trends & Strategic Opportunities

The mass tort landscape is evolving rapidly, with new cases gaining momentum and established litigations reaching critical phases. For law firms and legal marketers, timing is everything—success hinges on anticipating trends, securing high-value claimants early, and...

Zyprexa & Risperdal 2: The Breast Cancer Link That Could Ignite the Next Mass Tort

The pharmaceutical litigation landscape has seen its share of blockbuster cases—from opioid multidistrict litigations to the ongoing Paraquat Parkinson’s claims. But a new California lawsuit (Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al.) could revive two legacy antipsychotics...

Mass Torts in 2025: A Legal Landscape in Flux

As 2025 unfolds, the world of mass tort litigation shows no signs of slowing down. From pharmaceutical giants to tech behemoths, corporations across industries are facing an unprecedented wave of lawsuits that could reshape their futures. With judges issuing critical...

The PFAS Contamination Crisis: A Deep Dive into the Mass Tort Litigation and Its Implications

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals,” have become a focal point of environmental and public health concerns in the United States. These synthetic chemicals, used for their water, heat, and grease-resistant properties,...

The Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit: A Must-Know Update for Mass Tort Lawyers

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become a cornerstone of modern diets, but their convenience comes at a cost. As consumption of these foods has skyrocketed, so too have the alarming health complications linked to them, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and...

Understanding the BioZorb Litigation: A Growing Legal Battle for Plaintiff Attorneys

What is BioZorb? The BioZorb litigation is shaping up to be one of the most significant legal challenges of 2025, presenting a unique opportunity for plaintiff attorneys nationwide. This case revolves around a medical device designed to aid breast cancer patients but...

The Role of Technology in Optimizing Workers’ Compensation Lead Generation

The process of generating and managing workers' compensation leads has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of technology. Modern tools and software solutions are now indispensable in streamlining operations, improving lead quality, and enhancing...

How to Build a Referral Network for Mass Tort Cases

Mass tort cases often involve a large number of claimants seeking justice for harm caused by a common defendant, such as pharmaceutical companies or manufacturers. For attorneys specializing in these cases, building a robust referral network can significantly boost...

Ready to Start Receiving Qualified Leads?

Get exclusive, real-time legal leads delivered to your firm.

Get Started