...

Let’s Talk About Talc: Here’s What You Should Know About the Talcum Powder Lawsuit

by Fadi Agour | Apr 15, 2019

talcum powder lawsuit

The 13th Report on Carcinogens lists 243 agents considered cancer hazards to humans.

Cancer-causing substances are in everything from pollution to processed meats. But when a company knows that their products might be linked to cancer, they have a duty to report it. It’s this duty to report that underlies the talcum power lawsuit.

Women across the US have been using Johnson & Johnson products for many years. Some believe that they developed cancer as a result. As such, they have the legal right to bring the company to court to pay for their suffering.

Keep reading to learn more about the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuit. It could be the next mass tort lead you’ve been looking for.

What is the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

The first talcum powder lawsuit was filed by Deanne Berg. She claimed that regularly using Johnson & Johnson baby powder caused her ovarian cancer. Failing to sign the confidentiality agreement, she turned down $1.3 million so that others knew about the hazards of this household staple.

Today, there are nearly 12,000 lawsuits related to talcum products produced by Johnson & Johnson. The majority of these involve women who claim to have developed ovarian cancer from the regular use of the companies talc products. Under product liability law, these women are entitled to damages for a product that’s considered defective.

Is There a Link Between Talcum Power and Cancer?

There are over 40 scientific papers exploring the link between talcum powder and cancer. This research dates back over 50 years.

Scientists believe that the link between talc and cancer has to do with asbestos. Talc is a natural mineral and, where talc is mined, asbestos is often present as well. When the talc isn’t properly purified, trace amounts of asbestos can remain in the talc – and asbestos is a human carcinogen.

Despite the overwhelming amount of research on the topic, the link between talcum powder and cancer is highly disputed. In fact, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers cosmetic-grade talc to be safe for human use.

But recently it’s come to light that Johnson & Johnson not only knew about the link between their products and cancer, but they actively worked to suppress the evidence. It’s believed that they withheld laboratory reports that found asbestos fibers in their products. There’s also reports that they engaged in manipulation of FDA testing requirements.

What Products Are Involved in the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

As one of the oldest and most reputable companies producing talc products, the largest talcum powder lawsuits to date involve Johnson & Johnson. There are two specific products involved in the majority of these lawsuits: Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower-to Shower Body Powder.

Johnson’s Baby Powder has been around for over 100 years. It’s marketed as a treatment for both diaper rash as well as vaginal odors. Similarly, Shower-to-Shower Body Powder has been around for 50 years and is typically marketed as a treatment for vaginal odors.

Lawsuits have been brought against other companies producing talc-based products as well. These include talcum powder lawsuits against Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, as well as Colgate-Palmolive.

Help Clients Get Justice

The talcum powder lawsuit has nearly 12,000 current cases for good reason. Recent evidence suggests that they both knew about the link between their products and cancer and actively tried to cover it up. As more internal reports are discovered and more lawsuits are brought before the courts, the opportunity to help clients receive justice grows.

And for more potential leads for your lawsuit, check out our practice areas.

Explore More Articles

Why Law Firms Lose the Cases They Already Paid For: 6 Foundation Gaps We See From the Other Side

Marketing agencies write about law firm growth from the outside looking in. We have a different vantage point. Best Case Leads delivers exclusive personal injury leads to law firms across the country, which means we watch the same product, a real injured claimant...

Bicycle Crash Claims: What Personal Injury Firms Need to Know About Liability, Evidence, and Intake

In 2024, 1,103 cyclists were killed and an estimated 52,887 were injured in U.S. traffic crashes, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. For plaintiff firms, those crashes produce some of the most serious injuries in the motor vehicle docket...

The Jealous Mistress Was Always a Bad Business Model: A Growth Framework for Solo and Small Personal Injury Firms

The Jealous Mistress Was Always a Bad Business Model: A Growth Framework for Solo and Small Personal Injury Firms Justice Story's line about the law demanding "lavish homage" has been quoted to every law student for two centuries. It produced a profession with...

Nearly Half of Law Firms Cannot Be Reached by Phone. The Problem Is Not Marketing. It Is the Empty Chair Next to the Owner.

In 2024, Clio commissioned a secret-shopper study of American law firms. Researchers posed as prospective clients and contacted 500 firms by phone and email. The results, published in the 2024 Legal Trends Report, were unambiguous. Only 40 percent of firms answered...

The Trial Lawyer Who Never Tries a Case: How to Grow a Personal Injury Firm Without Losing the Only Leverage That Matters

In 1990, federal district courts completed 4,765 civil jury trials. In 2025, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, they completed 1,048, a decline of 10 percent in a single year and roughly 78 percent over the generation. The state courts, where...

Best Case Leads Celebrates Sixth Consecutive Year on Inc. 5000 List of Fastest-Growing Private Companies in America

Aug 19, 2025 | Press Releases Houston, TX, August 18, 2025 — Best Case Leads, a pioneering leader in legal lead generation, proudly announces its sixth consecutive recognition on the prestigious Inc. 5000 fastest-growing private companies in America, securing...

Baby Formula Litigation, NEC Claims, and the Evolving Landscape of Mass Torts

By Fadi Agour, J.D. Families of premature infants who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed cow–milk–based formula products like Similac and Enfamil continue to pursue justice in both state and federal courts. Recent...

Mass Tort Landscape 2025: Key Cases, Trends & Strategic Opportunities

The mass tort landscape is evolving rapidly, with new cases gaining momentum and established litigations reaching critical phases. For law firms and legal marketers, timing is everything—success hinges on anticipating trends, securing high-value claimants early, and...

Zyprexa & Risperdal 2: The Breast Cancer Link That Could Ignite the Next Mass Tort

The pharmaceutical litigation landscape has seen its share of blockbuster cases—from opioid multidistrict litigations to the ongoing Paraquat Parkinson’s claims. But a new California lawsuit (Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al.) could revive two legacy antipsychotics...

Mass Torts in 2025: A Legal Landscape in Flux

As 2025 unfolds, the world of mass tort litigation shows no signs of slowing down. From pharmaceutical giants to tech behemoths, corporations across industries are facing an unprecedented wave of lawsuits that could reshape their futures. With judges issuing critical...